<?xml version="1.0"?>
<oembed><version>1.0</version><provider_name>Tilleke &amp; Gibbins</provider_name><provider_url>https://www.tilleke.com</provider_url><author_name>Eric</author_name><author_url>https://www.tilleke.com/author/eric/</author_url><title>Thai Court Decision Moves Design Assessment Closer to International Standards - Tilleke &amp; Gibbins</title><type>rich</type><width>600</width><height>338</height><html>&lt;blockquote class="wp-embedded-content" data-secret="37tS2FIf2l"&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.tilleke.com/insights/thai-court-decision-moves-design-assessment-closer-to-international-standards"&gt;Thai Court Decision Moves Design Assessment Closer to International Standards&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;iframe sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" src="https://www.tilleke.com/insights/thai-court-decision-moves-design-assessment-closer-to-international-standards/embed/#?secret=37tS2FIf2l" width="600" height="338" title="&#x201C;Thai Court Decision Moves Design Assessment Closer to International Standards&#x201D; &#x2014; Tilleke &amp; Gibbins" data-secret="37tS2FIf2l" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" class="wp-embedded-content"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&lt;script type="text/javascript"&gt;
/* &lt;![CDATA[ */
/*! This file is auto-generated */
!function(d,l){"use strict";l.querySelector&amp;&amp;d.addEventListener&amp;&amp;"undefined"!=typeof URL&amp;&amp;(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&amp;&amp;!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),c=new RegExp("^https?:$","i"),i=0;i&lt;o.length;i++)o[i].style.display="none";for(i=0;i&lt;a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&amp;&amp;(s.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message?(1e3&lt;(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r&lt;200&amp;&amp;(r=200),s.height=r):"link"===t.message&amp;&amp;(r=new URL(s.getAttribute("src")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&amp;&amp;n.host===r.host&amp;&amp;l.activeElement===s&amp;&amp;(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener("message",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content"),r=0;r&lt;s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute("data-secret"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+="#?secret="+t,e.setAttribute("data-secret",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:"ready",secret:t},"*")},!1)))}(window,document);
/* ]]&gt; */
&lt;/script&gt;
</html><description>Thailand&#x2019;s Central Intellectual Property and International Trade (IP&amp;IT) Court has delivered a favorable ruling for Sumitomo Rubber Industries, Ltd., a major player in the tire manufacturing industry, regarding the registration of its motorcycle tire design patent. In this case, Tilleke &amp; Gibbins represented Sumitomo in successfully advocating for recognition of the unique design elements in the company&#x2019;s motorcycle tire products. Case Overview The case revolved around Sumitomo&#x2019;s two design patent applications for motorcycle tire designs, which were initially rejected by the Department of Intellectual Property (DIP) on the grounds that they were similar to prior art. Based on an examination of the design elements, primarily focusing on the tire tread patterns, the DIP&#x2019;s Patent Board had concluded that Sumitomo&#x2019;s designs were not sufficiently unique to warrant patent protection, as the tread patterns of the new designs were deemed too similar to one found in prior art for tire products. In</description><thumbnail_url>https://www.tilleke.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/SumitomoTiresComparison.jpg</thumbnail_url></oembed>
